Bhakti is the only path through which we can connect with Ishwara and whoever become hurdle in Ishwara's Devotees with bad intentions he is always
#Thread
BHAKTI MARG ACCORDING TO SHIVAPURAN
There Nothing is more pleasurable than the Path of Bhakti in all the Loka's and in all the four Yuga, whoever dives in this sacred ocean of Ishwara's Bhakti , can definitely attain Mokshā and get relief from BhavaSagara ,
Bhakti is the only path through which we can connect with Ishwara and whoever become hurdle in Ishwara's Devotees with bad intentions he is always
The Bhakti which is inspired by Shashtra's and is surrendered to Ishwara by heart selflessly , considered to be श्रेष्ठ , and which is full of Selfishness is always called निम्नकोटी भक्ति .
- there are 6 types of नैष्ठि and
- 1 of अनैष्ठि
There are mainly two types of devotion -
1) सगुण
2) निर्गुण
● श्रवण - Hearing the Lord's Kirtan by drowning in devotion.
● कीर्तन - Performing bhajan with pure devotion by singing the glory of the Lord.
~ Remembering God by conquering all kinds of fears. (Nirguna bhakti)
~ To serve the Lord from dawn to dusk. (Saguna)
● सेवन - Control of all senses and following the path of virtue prescribed by the Veda.
● अर्चन - Always consider yourself to be Prabhu Kinkar and always being indulge in worshipping Ishwara.
● सख्य - Have unwavering faith in Ishwara, that there is something good in both in मंगल and अमंगल ।
More from ༺【 Sānşकृति 】༻
#Thread on #BhagvadGita : The Divine Gift of Shri Krishna to ब्रह्माण्ड!
Tomorrow is the Ekadashi of Margasirsha Shukla Paksh , the day when Sri Krishna gave the divine knowledge of Bhagvad Gita. Honestly speaking,no one has the capability to describe the glories of this divine knowledge Bhagvad Gitā in https://t.co/SnrpNuIV8L comes under 'Bhishma
Parva' which is from Chapter 13 to 42.
The first chapter of Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta begins with chapter 25 of Bhishma Parva.
The names of 4 Parva that comes under Bhishma Parva are:
1) Jambhund Nirman Parv
2) Bhoomi Parva
3) Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta Parva
4)BhismaVadh Parva
Description of all the chapters are given in Padma Purana briefly and Gītāsaar in Agnipurana.
This book is the compilation of all the Shashtras.
इमं विवस्वते योगं प्रोक्तवानहमव्ययम् |
विवस्वान्मनवे प्राह मनुरिक्ष्वाकवेऽब्रवीत् |
According to this shloka Sri Hari gave the divine Gyaan of Gita to Surya Dev before giving it to Arjuna.
Tomorrow is the Ekadashi of Margasirsha Shukla Paksh , the day when Sri Krishna gave the divine knowledge of Bhagvad Gita. Honestly speaking,no one has the capability to describe the glories of this divine knowledge Bhagvad Gitā in https://t.co/SnrpNuIV8L comes under 'Bhishma
Parva' which is from Chapter 13 to 42.
The first chapter of Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta begins with chapter 25 of Bhishma Parva.
The names of 4 Parva that comes under Bhishma Parva are:
1) Jambhund Nirman Parv
2) Bhoomi Parva
3) Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta Parva
4)BhismaVadh Parva
Description of all the chapters are given in Padma Purana briefly and Gītāsaar in Agnipurana.
This book is the compilation of all the Shashtras.
इमं विवस्वते योगं प्रोक्तवानहमव्ययम् |
विवस्वान्मनवे प्राह मनुरिक्ष्वाकवेऽब्रवीत् |
According to this shloka Sri Hari gave the divine Gyaan of Gita to Surya Dev before giving it to Arjuna.
More from Culture
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
You May Also Like
Keep dwelling on this:
Further Examination of the Motif near PRRA Reveals Close Structural Similarity to the SEB Superantigen as well as Sequence Similarities to Neurotoxins and a Viral SAg.
The insertion PRRA together with 7 sequentially preceding residues & succeeding R685 (conserved in β-CoVs) form a motif, Y674QTQTNSPRRAR685, homologous to those of neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) and Bungarus genera, as well as neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
(20) (Fig. 2D). We further noticed that the same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.
https://t.co/EwwJOSa8RK
In (B), the segment S680PPRAR685 including the PRRA insert and highly conserved cleavage site *R685* is shown in van der Waals representation (black labels) and nearby CDR residues of the TCRVβ domain are labeled in blue/white
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Sequence Identity %
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Y674 - QTQTNSPRRA - R685
Similar to neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) & Bungarus genera & neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
T678 - NSPRRA- R685
Superantigenic core, consistently aligned against bacterial or viral SAgs
Further Examination of the Motif near PRRA Reveals Close Structural Similarity to the SEB Superantigen as well as Sequence Similarities to Neurotoxins and a Viral SAg.
The insertion PRRA together with 7 sequentially preceding residues & succeeding R685 (conserved in β-CoVs) form a motif, Y674QTQTNSPRRAR685, homologous to those of neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) and Bungarus genera, as well as neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
(20) (Fig. 2D). We further noticed that the same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.
https://t.co/EwwJOSa8RK
In (B), the segment S680PPRAR685 including the PRRA insert and highly conserved cleavage site *R685* is shown in van der Waals representation (black labels) and nearby CDR residues of the TCRVβ domain are labeled in blue/white
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Sequence Identity %
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Y674 - QTQTNSPRRA - R685
Similar to neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) & Bungarus genera & neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
T678 - NSPRRA- R685
Superantigenic core, consistently aligned against bacterial or viral SAgs
