#SSRWaiting4Justice
i was murderd
#SSRWaiting4Justice
i m waiting for justice
#SSRWaiting4Justice
cbi plz asap break ur silence
#SSRWaiting4Justice
i know u r a very responsible agency of india
#SSRWaiting4Justice
i blv u by heart & soul
#SSRWaiting4Justice
i know u r working & on going ur investigation
#SSRWaiting4Justice
bt 6 mnths passes & I don't get any updates from you
#SSRWaiting4Justice
so i think ask u that wtz going on actually
#SSRWaiting4Justice
if there iz ny improvement or not??
#SSRWaiting4Justice
my manager disha also raped & murderd on 8 th june
#SSRWaiting4Justice
she z also waiting for her justice
#SSRWaiting4Justice
our murder z linked up
#SSRWaiting4Justice
so we both need justice from you
#SSRWaiting4Justice
plz cbi give us a single updates

More from Crime

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?