Entire schedule has been disrupted because if pleadings not been filed. Republic filed on Saturday and may not be on record : Nayar
Delhi High Court begins hearing suit by #Bollywood Production Houses against 'Bollywood drugs mafia' reportage.
The suit seeks to curb irresponsible and derogatory remarks against the film industry.
The matter is before Justice Rajiv Shakdher.
#media
Entire schedule has been disrupted because if pleadings not been filed. Republic filed on Saturday and may not be on record : Nayar
Yes, we are seeking condonation: Senior Adv Sandeep Sethi for Times Now.
@TimesNow
Adv Malvika Trivedi for @republic also seeks condonation of delay.
I object to it. The suit itself is not maintainable: Sethi
Written statement is more like written submissions : Court
I've not seen it : Sethi
No Your lordship! We were waiting for the responses: Nayar
Matter to be listed before joint registrar for completion of pleading and admission-denial. The previous order will continue to operate: Court
Matter to be heard by court on March 23,2021.
There's no hurry: Court
Yes: Nayar
More from Bar & Bench
More from Crime
ICYMI
Hate Crime Indictment
Jason DeSimas
Jason Stanley
Randy Smith
Daniel Delbert Dorson
-aiding & abetting
-punched & kicked a Black man -derogatory comments about his actual & perceived race
-assaulting 2 other men who intervened to protect the
What’s a bit amazing is this hate crime took place in December of 2018 and the 4 defendants were indicted nearly two year on the nose. Because the Defendants were indicted for a hate crime.
That’s a force multiplier or at a minimum an enhancement of 10 years (addition to)
At first glance you wouldn’t think this had anything to do with White Supremacy -read page 4-
Dorson falsely claimed that he had not planned to attend a white supremacist’s “Martyr’s Day” observance in the state of WA
he had not owned a “flight jacket“
https://t.co/yU8t1DkyZA
Doc # 16 Detention Motion by USA
https://t.co/sxaBEqDLWr
“DeSimas admitted that he was a member of Crew 38,
a support club of Hammerskin Nation, a white supremacists organization...DeSimas lied to the FBI, denying that neither he nor anyone else had used the “N” word...”
always read those footnotes
3 other co-defendants are in custody
-Daniel Delbert Dorson ordered detained & will be
transferred to this District
-Randy Smith is detained in the District of OR, on an unrelated federal case
-Jason Stanley is detained at the ID DOC an unrelated case
Hate Crime Indictment
Jason DeSimas
Jason Stanley
Randy Smith
Daniel Delbert Dorson
-aiding & abetting
-punched & kicked a Black man -derogatory comments about his actual & perceived race
-assaulting 2 other men who intervened to protect the
What’s a bit amazing is this hate crime took place in December of 2018 and the 4 defendants were indicted nearly two year on the nose. Because the Defendants were indicted for a hate crime.
That’s a force multiplier or at a minimum an enhancement of 10 years (addition to)
At first glance you wouldn’t think this had anything to do with White Supremacy -read page 4-
Dorson falsely claimed that he had not planned to attend a white supremacist’s “Martyr’s Day” observance in the state of WA
he had not owned a “flight jacket“
https://t.co/yU8t1DkyZA
Doc # 16 Detention Motion by USA
https://t.co/sxaBEqDLWr
“DeSimas admitted that he was a member of Crew 38,
a support club of Hammerskin Nation, a white supremacists organization...DeSimas lied to the FBI, denying that neither he nor anyone else had used the “N” word...”
always read those footnotes
3 other co-defendants are in custody
-Daniel Delbert Dorson ordered detained & will be
transferred to this District
-Randy Smith is detained in the District of OR, on an unrelated federal case
-Jason Stanley is detained at the ID DOC an unrelated case
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.