1/ #CapitolRiots fueled by #AlexJones’ propaganda.
Alex Jones paid $500K organize the event, admits he was directed by #Trump to lead the crowd to the Capitol.
.@FBI Pls Investigate Free Speech System’s & Trump’s communications, donors & pre-election funding of infowars.
Thought they moderated comments.
.@FBI
Praise God, my youngest child is finally safe with me, although Alex is actively distressing her, w intention.
It’s not enough & Alex’s counsel has pressured me while she has been in the ER 4 nights & while Alex was in DC inciting..
I will not be pressed to trial in Alex Jones’ latest cruel & unmeritorious lawsuit pursued solely to harm & to stifle my speech in secrecy..
They were denied medically necessary care &/or providers’ recommendations ignored.
The hearings in the case were sealed w out due process.
This has protected Alex &...
My child is ill and my attorney is overwhelmed.
Any citizen, attorney or organization can move to unseal Travis Co. D-1-FM-15-005030 under Rule 76(a) of TX Rules of Civil Procedure..
1/ I used to own infowars & left domestic abuse & cultic #ConspiracyTheory control.
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) May 7, 2020
Convicted criminal Roger Stone suddenly went on infowars prior to election. Infowars became Trump TV...Infowars paid for airtime & advertising & has a history of working with Russian Media... pic.twitter.com/FqfdgBt8OC
Ms. Handler, I'm Kelly Jones, former owner of infowars.
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) November 8, 2018
The propaganda of fake news infowars, which was instrumental in getting Trump elected, aims to destroy the Free Press so that fascism can take total control.
The attack on Acosta is an attack on the 1st and cannot stand. pic.twitter.com/JBpD1l6DmH
The propaganda machine behind #Trump includes infowars & #AlexJones who Trump said has \u201can excellent reputation.\u201d
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) October 9, 2020
Trump has retweeted infowars.
Here\u2019s what infowars said about #Michigan lockdown protestors. Is this a threat? Enticement to violence? pic.twitter.com/aAfbKZficg
This is my ex-husband, Alex Jones, graphically describing how he'll kill his neighbor to f e e d my kids:
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) May 1, 2020
Homicidal.
Terrifying.
I lost my kids for tweeting about injustice.
This is UNJUST to my kids.
This is a mom's worst nightmare.
Court must act.
Help RT pic.twitter.com/vCxaVcros6
#Mueller should investigate how it is that the feloniously collusive parties (Trump, Corsi and Roger Stone) all came to appear on infowars, which became a major campaign platform for Trump. They should investigate all paid advertising, wages, changes in corporate structure. pic.twitter.com/katoK01ILl
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) December 8, 2018
Alex Jones mimes shooting, tells Mueller, “You're going to get it, or I'm going to die trying, bitch. Get ready”
.@FBI
Thank you .@godboltjb for if this is for real, the possible criminal implications seem to be verrrrrry serious.
#TrumpBan
#FBI https://t.co/1mLGPbsdD2
That helps explain the infowars sticker on the law enforcement vehicle. Accidental placement by that rabble during a riot seems unlikely to me.
— James Godbolt (@godboltjb) January 9, 2021
Some of those that work forces..... pic.twitter.com/h3qNWijCJN
Spinning your role after crossing the country in a tank, calling for 1776 & paying for the stage at DC cannot be mitigated by snarky & false calls for calm out of the side of your mouth https://t.co/34K3bzGUia
@FBI Attack on Capitol was an inside job.
— GOD HATES TRUMP (@Antifa_Tubes) January 9, 2021
Donald Trump and Alex Jones coordinated the attack on the Capitol.
They are partners in crime and coordinated the attack for several days if not weeks.
Attack failed, so now they obviously blame Antifa. pic.twitter.com/2yNbR0AqzS
These calls to burn down Twitter, to prep for civil war and sick antiSemitism are on infowars TODAY in “moderated” comments to incendiary articles.
#TrumpBanned #FBI
Here is #AlexJones, who repeatedly lauds violence & talks civil war praising the #ProudBoys as \u201cheroes\u201d in a \u201cwar w #GavinMcInnes https://t.co/vtrlRVx9PH
— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) September 27, 2020
Hearings have been UNLAWFULLY sealed from public oversight. Open courts are guaranteed by the 1st Amendment.
If the hearing is not open & I cannot address the Court I will refuse it as unconstitutional. Pls amplify #AlexJones
Shut it down. #UnplugInfowars
@FBI
Alex Jones at the front on the march to the #Capitol next to #AliAlexander w #TrumpSupporters shouting “This is history happening! We’re not giving into the globalists! We’re never surrendering!”
Please retweet this tweet & thread.
#FBI see .@dudgedudy feed:
Chilling propaganda w explosions over.@JoeBiden, “artwork”: “Fight for Trump,” MAPS, & Alex talking about #Trump’s meeting with #RogerStone, “big things afoot.” #TrumpSupporters
Trying to verify photo. If you have information or original footage pls send to the #FBI & report.
https://t.co/44fxbUSn1q
I believe any American would be concerned about the content & am reporting it according to my duty.
Will post clips when I can
An unidentified man (Security of some sort??) turns to the March & seems to say, "Alex! It's time to storm the Capitol! Backstage!"
Cannot post, tagged as “harmful.” Why .@TwitterSupport?
More from Court
Some initial observations about this case, and in particular what the Court of Appeal made of the Attorney General’s application to refer these sentences as “unduly lenient”.
Spoiler: it makes uncomfortable reading for the Attorney General.
First, by way of background. I was one of several commentators astonished that the Attorney General, who has no known experience of practising criminal law, decided to personally present this serious case at the Court of Appeal.
It appeared an overtly political decision.
Comments leaked to the press confirmed this was a political decision, to capitalise on a tragic case in the headlines.
A “friend” of the Attorney General told the Express that she was pursuing the case *against* legal advice. She also took a preemptive pop at the judges.
On the day of the hearing, it appeared from selected reports that the AG was out of her depth. She appeared to be making political submissions to the Court of Appeal that have no place in a case of this type.
The Court of Appeal judgment helps understand what happened.
The AG played a limited role. She “rehearsed some of the facts and said that the sentences had caused widespread public concern”
Her contribution was seemingly not considered by the Court to be legal submissions. Oof.
Spoiler: it makes uncomfortable reading for the Attorney General.
There will be no substantive change to the sentences passed on the killers of Pc Andrew Harper.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) December 16, 2020
The Attorney General\u2019s application to refer the sentences as unduly lenient and the defence applications for leave to appeal against sentence have been refused by the Court of Appeal. https://t.co/qxTzuj7jR3
First, by way of background. I was one of several commentators astonished that the Attorney General, who has no known experience of practising criminal law, decided to personally present this serious case at the Court of Appeal.
It appeared an overtly political decision.
Grimly cynical.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) November 12, 2020
The Attorney General - who has absolutely no experience of criminal law - is so desperate to exploit this tragic case that she is inserting herself into proceedings that she is not competent to conduct.https://t.co/QWdINvUwwf
Comments leaked to the press confirmed this was a political decision, to capitalise on a tragic case in the headlines.
A “friend” of the Attorney General told the Express that she was pursuing the case *against* legal advice. She also took a preemptive pop at the judges.
Before the hearing, the Attorney General leaked to the Daily Express, via an alleged \u201cfriend\u201d, her views that, should the judges find against her, it will be because they are \u201cwet liberal judges\u201d who are \u201csoft on criminals\u201d. https://t.co/5uGggN8tTT
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) November 30, 2020
On the day of the hearing, it appeared from selected reports that the AG was out of her depth. She appeared to be making political submissions to the Court of Appeal that have no place in a case of this type.
The Attorney General had to be embarrassingly corrected during the hearing by an actual criminal silk after making irrelevant and politicised submissions to the Court of Appeal.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) November 30, 2020
What a farce. pic.twitter.com/wy81xoFIDI
The Court of Appeal judgment helps understand what happened.
The AG played a limited role. She “rehearsed some of the facts and said that the sentences had caused widespread public concern”
Her contribution was seemingly not considered by the Court to be legal submissions. Oof.
You May Also Like
MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.
Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.
• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria
How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr
• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit
Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in
1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr
• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only
2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.
• Identified a reversal and sold puts
• Puts decayed a lot
• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.
• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria
How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr
• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit
1. Let's start option selling learning.
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) February 10, 2019
Strangle selling. ( I am doing mostly in weekly Bank Nifty)
When to sell? When VIX is below 15
Assume spot is at 27500
Sell 27100 PE & 27900 CE
say premium for both 50-50
If bank nifty will move in narrow range u will get profit from both.
Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in
Few are selling 20-25 Rs positional option selling course.
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) November 3, 2019
Nothing big deal in that.
For selling weekly option just identify last week low and high.
Now from that low and high keep 1-1.5% distance from strike.
And sell option on both side.
1/n
1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr
• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only
Sold 29200 put and 30500 call
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) April 12, 2019
Used 20% capital@44 each
2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.
• Identified a reversal and sold puts
• Puts decayed a lot
• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
Already giving more than 2% return in a week. Now I will prefer to sell 32500 call at 74 to make it strangle in equal ratio.
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) February 7, 2020
To all. This is free learning for you. How to play option to make consistent return.
Stay tuned and learn it here free of cost. https://t.co/7J7LC86oW0
Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
