Six Blogs/Websites from which you can learn and stay updated about Python 🐍

Thread 🧵👇

1⃣ @realpython

The best site for Python. It helped me a lot personally in the learning process.

🔗https://t.co/iqQbFXNlm7
2⃣ Python Blogs

A dedicated platform for learners and professionals for Python

🔗https://t.co/OYDOezUJn0
3⃣ @PythonPool

Python Pool is a platform where you can learn and become an expert in every aspect of Python programming language as well as in AI, ML, and Data Science.

🔗https://t.co/T4PLkE9Ton
4⃣ Microsoft Dev Blog - Python

Read the latest updates about all things Python at Microsoft

🔗https://t.co/6JLurMmOfr
5⃣ @PythonInsider

Python core development news and information.

🔗https://t.co/DaA7ldff0q
6⃣ @talkpython

Talk Python To Me is a podcast for developers who are passionate about Python. Learn about the language and related technologies.

🔗https://t.co/bev9iZPNxU
Hey 👋

Thanks for reading the thread ❤️

If you find it useful then retweet the first tweet 👇
https://t.co/3bKmcsOUBC

More from Coding

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?