We often hear that prediction in markets is a nasty game, but we don't really have to believe everything we read on social media. Do we? As long as you maintain good accuracy in your predictions, you will do absolutely great.
#CNXIT https://t.co/w3qedea7T6
Almost there. Quick move. It can spend time over here before the next leg of fall. Let's see.#NIFTYIT https://t.co/GOB28HRvMp pic.twitter.com/6sNc7j8gEU
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 9, 2022
More from Aakash Gangwar
#Nifty50 https://t.co/ajpEwosu3v
JK bhai let's have fake breakout in Nifty \U0001f61c
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 10, 2022
Not joking though, have a reason to anticipate that. https://t.co/idzSRIpWga pic.twitter.com/MNsTm3Mron
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
This is the maximum upside for now, post that I am looking for an 8-9% fall in index.#nifty50 pic.twitter.com/BcSOiwWuBs
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 24, 2022
#KPITTECH https://t.co/qPLH3li2Yy
Charts for reference. During a downtrend, news based buying is an opportunity to make an exit in most of the cases. #KPITTECH #Hikal https://t.co/63WBMFZ6BT pic.twitter.com/OgWzulTXiD
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) April 27, 2022
More from Cnxitlongterm
#CNXIT
Parabolic move has been triggered. Let's have 27k. That could be the buying zone for IT names. #CNXIT https://t.co/bJeKTMoCji pic.twitter.com/ab6w1mysz0
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) May 19, 2022
Weekly chart.
Each Fibonacci retracement level shown in #box likely to be tested in time to come.
#Perspective https://t.co/aDDZJV2KE3
#CNXIT-36442#NiFTY IT
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) March 25, 2022
Weekly chart.
Objective is to creat lower top against ATH.(39446.70)
MACD showing negative divergence. Attract selling pressure in time to come.#Probability pic.twitter.com/hPx8SMpeoo
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.