They find the property, do all the work, hire the management company and take fees. They often co-sign debt and always secure the financing.
A THREAD on how most real estate folks structure deals with outside investors.
Most people utilize the "preferred equity" structure when they raise money from outside investors. They "syndicate" deals.
Here's the basics:
They find the property, do all the work, hire the management company and take fees. They often co-sign debt and always secure the financing.
They don't co-sign debt. They simply read reports and ask the sponsors questions and cash checks every month (if the deal is going well).
"Preferred equity" belongs to the LPs. Cash talks, so this is a higher class of shares. They are first in the "capital stack" behind the debt (bank loan).
"Common equity" belongs to the sponsor. They are generally last in the capital stack.
That means the GP has skin in the game. His 10% co-invest makes him both an LP and a GP.

That means they get paid first. The pref signals how much. Its generally 6-12%. That means the LP is entitled to the first 6-12% of profit the project generates.
New development, or high risk value add projects, generally warrant lower prefs and higher "promotes"
Its a percentage of profits the sponsor gets AFTER the LPs get their preferred return on their cash.
This ranges from 20% to 50%. It can change based on checkpoints, or "waterfall".
Because every day your LP capital isn't returned its accumulating "preferred returns" that you owe to the LP. The only way to stop it is to return it.
There are often additional waterfalls. 80/20 after an 8 pref and 50/50 after a 20% "hurdle".
A hurdle is a return percentage you need to hit to get into the next level of promote.
Internal Rate of Return.
When the deal is done, and my capital is back, what percent return have I earned?
Sponsors hate it because there are so many other factors that are more important to the health of the deal.

How long of a time frame are we on? These deals aren't liquid. LPs can't just ask for their money back.
Sponsors lay out the investment timeline and let everyone know how long this thing is expected to go.
Acquisition fees can be anywhere from 1-5%.
AUM fees are generally .5-2%.
The market sets these fees (as well as the pref and promote). If you have a track record, more fees.
I buy storage facilities so lets say we have a $1MM operational facility already at 90% occupancy.
Its (relatively) low risk so lets say the structure is 7 pref and 50% promote thereafter. No waterfalls.
We raise 300k from outside LPs to close out the deal. No co-invest to keep the math simple.
Starting on day 1 we owe the LPs a 7% annual rate (pref) on the $300k.
I would get paid $50k on day one to buy the deal and get it under ownership.
To keep the math simple we aren't building this in, but keep it in mind.
The 1% AUM fee would be $3,000 a year on the $300k.
That goes to the sponsor.
Our cash on cash would be around 15% or higher if we can secure Interest Only debt (not paying principle for the first period of time).
That means on day one I'm hitting the hurdle and getting paid
But we have $45k in cashflow, or $24k after the pref.
That money is split 50/50 between the GP and the LPs because we have a 50% promote.
Yr 1 the LPs get $21k+$12k for $33k. 11% IRR pace.
Yr 2 cashflow is even higher, $45k+$30k for $75k.
LPs are owed $21k as their pref and we have more to split up between the sponsor and LPs. LPs get another $27k and Sponsors get $27k.
Lets do a sale first. Our property might be worth a 7 cap on the new NOI, or $1.428MM. Lets say $1.5 for simple math.
We sell it for $1.5M at the 24 month mark. Home run deal.
Bank gets their $700k back first.
LPs get their $300k back next.
They've already been getting their pref from day 1 so we don't have a preferred return to "catch up" when we sell. So its 50/50 from here.
In 24 months the LPs made $81k in cashflow (or 13.5% per year).
That means the targeted cash yield on the deal should have been around 13.5% if the sponsors projections were correct. Cash yield doesn't account for sale, only ops.
A $331k total profit. In 2 yrs.
IRR: 55.16%
Equity Multiple: 2.1x
Add it to your resume, pay a bunch of taxes, and do a bigger deal!
Instead of selling the property for $1.5MM and paying a bunch of taxes and being stuck with $500k in capital that is earning nothing and needs re-deployed, lets hold the asset and put more debt on it.
They get the property appraised for $1.5MM, look at the debt service coverage ratio, and agree to lend 75% of the new value.
That means you can take $1,125,000 in new debt.
Bank gets paid $700k (original debt is cleared).
LPs get paid $300k (original investment, pref is no longer accruing)
You have $125k left over. Sponsor gets 50%. LPs get 50%.
EVERYTHING FROM HERE IS BUTTER.
The property still cashflows. You didn't pay a bunch of taxes. You still got LPs their money back and they're ready to do another deal with you.
You as the sponsor, now own 50% of a building you put $0 into.
I'm not a pro at this. Looking forward to getting corrected where I missed something.
There are thousands of ways to do this and terms and factors I didn't mention.
I just wish I could have read something like this a year ago when I first started on ReTwit.
https://t.co/h4fybmycuK
I use @GroundbreakerCo to manage my LPs. Same thing as Juniper Square except 1/5 the cost. Love it.
https://t.co/FEt1sBoSWS
More from Nick Huber
Don’t have much cash but want to invest in real estate?
Want to get SBA loans and special loan programs so you can buy real estate investments with only 5-10% down?
One word for you:
Don’t.
Here’s why
👇👇👇
Leverage can be a beautiful thing.
Appreciation takes over and all that value you bought with debt grows and you amplify your returns.
But there is another, darker side of debt.
Values drop 5 or 10% and you’re underwater. You have zero equity or negative equity.
Ask the folks who were over-levered in 2007 what happened on 2011?
Real estate is a frothy space right now. Money flying everywhere and values higher than they’ve ever been.
Debt is cheaper and easier to get than ever.
Will it continue?
Probably.
Money could stay cheap for a long time. There is a ton of negative yielding debt abroad and liquidity ready to flood our market at the drop of a hat.
Rates will likely stay low. Gov will probably keep subsidizing these loans. You’ll probably be okay.
Want to get SBA loans and special loan programs so you can buy real estate investments with only 5-10% down?
One word for you:
Don’t.
Here’s why
👇👇👇
Leverage can be a beautiful thing.
Appreciation takes over and all that value you bought with debt grows and you amplify your returns.
But there is another, darker side of debt.
Everybody I know loves LEVERAGE when it comes to real estate.
— Nick Huber (@sweatystartup) October 18, 2020
It\u2019s a beautiful and scary tool, kicking appreciation, depreciation, and cashflow into overdrive.
It amplifies everything. You can make a lot of money really fast and go broke in months.
Here\u2019s how it works\U0001f447\U0001f447\U0001f447
Values drop 5 or 10% and you’re underwater. You have zero equity or negative equity.
Ask the folks who were over-levered in 2007 what happened on 2011?
Real estate is a frothy space right now. Money flying everywhere and values higher than they’ve ever been.
Debt is cheaper and easier to get than ever.
Will it continue?
Probably.
Money could stay cheap for a long time. There is a ton of negative yielding debt abroad and liquidity ready to flood our market at the drop of a hat.
Rates will likely stay low. Gov will probably keep subsidizing these loans. You’ll probably be okay.
More from Business
Introducing "The Balloon Effect"
Many businesses & creators have experienced a similar pattern of success.
From @MrBeastYT and @MorningBrew to @oatly and @Rovio.
Let's break down what "The Balloon Effect" is and examples of it in real life.
Keep reading 👇
1/ What is "The Balloon Effect"?
It is a particular pattern of growth.
It is not Instagram's growth trajectory.
It is not https://t.co/5axsTUKek6's growth trajectory.
"The Balloon Effect" is defined by several years of hard work & grit complemented by slow, linear growth.
2/ And then one day, one month, or one quarter...everything changes.
A business hits a tipping point and its trajectory shifts entirely.
Gradual growth turns to exponential growth & your brand and your size explode.
Like a step function.
3/ Now, you're probably wondering.
Why is it called "The Balloon Effect"?
Because filling/popping a water balloon follows the exact pattern I just described (and so many businesses experience).
Long unsexy slog 👉 Exponential tipping point.
4/ Initially, you turn on the faucet & water takes up space in the empty balloon.
Through effort you open the faucet, yet the results are unexciting.
But it's what must be done for water (or growth) to happen at all.
It's not sexy, but it's necessary.
Many businesses & creators have experienced a similar pattern of success.
From @MrBeastYT and @MorningBrew to @oatly and @Rovio.
Let's break down what "The Balloon Effect" is and examples of it in real life.
Keep reading 👇

1/ What is "The Balloon Effect"?
It is a particular pattern of growth.
It is not Instagram's growth trajectory.
It is not https://t.co/5axsTUKek6's growth trajectory.
"The Balloon Effect" is defined by several years of hard work & grit complemented by slow, linear growth.
2/ And then one day, one month, or one quarter...everything changes.
A business hits a tipping point and its trajectory shifts entirely.
Gradual growth turns to exponential growth & your brand and your size explode.
Like a step function.
3/ Now, you're probably wondering.
Why is it called "The Balloon Effect"?
Because filling/popping a water balloon follows the exact pattern I just described (and so many businesses experience).
Long unsexy slog 👉 Exponential tipping point.
4/ Initially, you turn on the faucet & water takes up space in the empty balloon.
Through effort you open the faucet, yet the results are unexciting.
But it's what must be done for water (or growth) to happen at all.
It's not sexy, but it's necessary.
You May Also Like
Joshua Hawley, Missouri's Junior Senator, is an autocrat in waiting.
His arrogance and ambition prohibit any allegiance to morality or character.
Thus far, his plan to seize the presidency has fallen into place.
An explanation in photographs.
🧵
Joshua grew up in the next town over from mine, in Lexington, Missouri. A a teenager he wrote a column for the local paper, where he perfected his political condescension.
2/
By the time he reached high-school, however, he attended an elite private high-school 60 miles away in Kansas City.
This is a piece of his history he works to erase as he builds up his counterfeit image as a rural farm boy from a small town who grew up farming.
3/
After graduating from Rockhurst High School, he attended Stanford University where he wrote for the Stanford Review--a libertarian publication founded by Peter Thiel..
4/
(Full Link: https://t.co/zixs1HazLk)
Hawley's writing during his early 20s reveals that he wished for the curriculum at Stanford and other "liberal institutions" to change and to incorporate more conservative moral values.
This led him to create the "Freedom Forum."
5/
His arrogance and ambition prohibit any allegiance to morality or character.
Thus far, his plan to seize the presidency has fallen into place.
An explanation in photographs.
🧵
Joshua grew up in the next town over from mine, in Lexington, Missouri. A a teenager he wrote a column for the local paper, where he perfected his political condescension.
2/

By the time he reached high-school, however, he attended an elite private high-school 60 miles away in Kansas City.
This is a piece of his history he works to erase as he builds up his counterfeit image as a rural farm boy from a small town who grew up farming.
3/

After graduating from Rockhurst High School, he attended Stanford University where he wrote for the Stanford Review--a libertarian publication founded by Peter Thiel..
4/
(Full Link: https://t.co/zixs1HazLk)

Hawley's writing during his early 20s reveals that he wished for the curriculum at Stanford and other "liberal institutions" to change and to incorporate more conservative moral values.
This led him to create the "Freedom Forum."
5/

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x

PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ

The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.