Correlation between bonds and equities? 👇🏻
More from The_Chartist 📈
Deepak nitrite
Explained you same concept with Elxsi. The real test of a strong Breakout is that the big hand will not give you another chance to buy the share at the breakout level. They will absorb all the selling of weak hands. I mean "STRONG breakout". https://t.co/7fxFqGQl3p
Explained you same concept with Elxsi. The real test of a strong Breakout is that the big hand will not give you another chance to buy the share at the breakout level. They will absorb all the selling of weak hands. I mean "STRONG breakout". https://t.co/7fxFqGQl3p
Tata Elxsi ---
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) June 30, 2021
In the last 10 minutes, all the selling was absorbed despite intraday positions being squared off (if not converted). will wait for the EOD data. However, the chart structure is extremely strong. https://t.co/pci7GCDBEO pic.twitter.com/1NBD9V3mKc
You May Also Like
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
