✅ 🇺🇸 ✅ How can Joe Biden be inaugurated if Democrats circumvented the state legislatures, defiled the Constitution, and forced the certification of a fraudulent popular vote?

Even though the Democrat Party and their media cohorts are pushing Joe Biden into the presidency as

More from Warren C.🇺🇸 45th POTUS = G.O.A.T. 🇺🇸 ✝️

💥🔴🟠🟡 Situation Update, Dec. 17th – Ratcliffe confirmation of foreign interference hands Trump justification to SEIZE ballots, voting machines

There is an incredible dynamic unfolding today as the deep state is pressuring DNI Ratcliffe to try to delay the foreign


interference report that’s due this Friday (the 18th).

🔸Fauci says 85% of Americans will need to be vaccinated against COVID-19 for the U.S. to reach ‘herd immunity’ –
https://t.co/xgPjoY6noa

🔸Experts slam the use of infrared forehead-scanning thermometers to screen for

Covid-19 as ‘unreliable, inaccurate and ineffective’ – https://t.co/zpE4U0VAQT

🔸Candace Owens Calls Dr Fauci, Bill Gates & Big Pharma ‘Evil" - “Dr. Fauci is evil. Bill Gates is evil. The pharmaceutical industry is wrought with corruption and pure evil” Owens wrote to her 2.8

million followers. Owens previously vowed that she will “under no circumstances” take any coronavirus vaccine, “Ever. No matter what,” she wrote back in April. https://t.co/jpl5AyPYiD

🔸Office of the DNI DELAYS the foreign interference report – Tweets
Amanda Schoch, ODNI

Director of Strategic Communications: “This afternoon the DNI was notified by career intelligence officials that the Intelligence Community will not meet the December 18 deadline, set by Executive Order and Congress…”

“to submit the IC’s classified assessment on foreign threats

More from Biden

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?