ATUL is the 1st company of India to manufacture :-
• P-Cresol
• Resorcinol
• Dapsone
• Epoxy Resins
• Phosgene
• Sulphonyl ureas
• 2,4-D Acid & derivatives
• P-Anisic Aldehyde
• Dyes and intermediates on a large scale
• Propagate tissue cultured date palms
More from Saket Reddy
DEEPAKNTR
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 2189.89 daily close on 1% Box Size Chart. https://t.co/dEAqzILJj4
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 2189.89 daily close on 1% Box Size Chart. https://t.co/dEAqzILJj4
DEEPAKNTR
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) March 30, 2021
Double Top Buy & ABC Breakout above 1608.64 daily close on 1% Box size chart & Double Top Buy active on 3% Box size chart.
2000 Coming! https://t.co/ifywtsGM0S pic.twitter.com/VM7TneVwOr
JBCHEPHARM
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
JBCHEPHARM
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) July 16, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish and T20 Pattern - Bullish triggered above 1886.26 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bzIsbWjbEP pic.twitter.com/JQVkao635V
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".