🗣 Brandwatch Interviews Thread 📝

We love to get interesting and intelligent people on our blog, so we've been doing a bunch of interviews lately.

We'll be listing them all in this thread. Scroll down for some great insights, opinions, and thoughts.

⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️

Ever heard of Mixed Martial Analytics? Us neither until we spoke to @tonyclement about his unique approach to data analysis: https://t.co/hG41Tk4Dkx
We spoke to @brendaisarebel about the customer operations challenges at a modern and app-based bank: https://t.co/PMm9LfZJUe
We also had @jennisparks take us through what it takes to create unique and beautiful maps: https://t.co/KSiMxvypFY
Our very own data scientist, Paul Siegel, sat down with us to talk about asking the right questions when it comes to social intelligence: https://t.co/pu0uJYuunO
We talked personal and digital transformation, and how the two are linked, with @hyperisland's Anna Carlson: https://t.co/bhHnpWF38A
How can we make sure tech evolves in a way that benefits society? We discussed the topic with @nesta_uk's @jennilloyd: https://t.co/lH1hauMf7H

More from All

Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.


After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be
https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year


as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x