1/ A brief thread (and there will be something more long-form -- on the contagion of rage -- to come).

A few words on the cultural power of presidents.

2/ When the new U.S. government was launched under the Constitution, the Founding folk assumed -- worried -- that the President's behavior would have an enormous influence on the American people, the tone of governance, the temper of the nation, and national character.
3/ They worried that if the President adopted aristocratic manners or lived a lavish lifestyle, that the American people would grow to admire those standards and endorse them, and the nation would suffer for it.
4/ For that reason, they closely watched the president's habits and manners. How did he dress? What kinds of dishes did he use on his table? How did he interact with the American people? Did he interact with them?
5/ As trivial as these things seem, people assumed that the national executive--a person of power w/the endorsement of being voted into office--would shape the nation w/his example. They assumed that everyday actions mattered. Words mattered. The visuals of leadership mattered.
6/ Washington understood that. And although he set an example that some considered too "high-toned" (i.e. aristocratic) for a republic, he carefully considered the implications of his actions, words, & appearance. He tried to embody his interpretation of a republican president.
7/ The underlying assumption was a good one. Leaders shape constituencies w/their attitude & actions as well as w/their policies, & that's particularly true of the President, who shapes the nation's character by acting the role of American leader before a national audience.
8/ When a President praises and jokes about violence and attacks the idea of a free press, it matters.
The cheering, laughing crowds who endorse those sentiments at his rallies -- and are visible standing behind him -- show the impact of those ideas in real time.
9/ When his party stays silent in the face of those threats, it matters.
Their silence is a tacit endorsement.
And a reign of violence with a strategically stifled press is not democratic governance.
10/ If you agree w/this President, you may not see a threat.
But here's the thing.
If he can stifle & silence some Americans, he can stifle & silence you, when the time is right.
To endorse this style of leadership is to surrender your power as an American citizen.
11/ Throughout its history, the United States has struggled to reach some key ideals.
The government is accountable to the American people.
A free press allows for that accountability.
Voting rights enforce it.

These ideals are being denigrated before our eyes on a daily basis.
12/ We haven't always lived up to these ideals.
Not by a long shot.
But they have persisted as something worth striving for.
They are part of the core cluster of values that have helped to define what America can be.
13/ If you care about those ideals...
Put people in office who share them.
Vote for those who don't define themselves by violating them.
14/ This election will have enormous implications pragmatically, politically, & ideologically.
It will make a statement.
Add your voice to that statement & vote.

END.
(For now...)

More from All

#தினம்_ஒரு_திருவாசகம்
தொல்லை இரும்பிறவிச் சூழும் தளை நீக்கி
அல்லல் அறுத்து ஆனந்தம் ஆக்கியதே – எல்லை
மருவா நெறியளிக்கும் வாதவூர் எங்கோன்
திருவாசகம் என்னும் தேன்

பொருள்:
1.எப்போது ஆரம்பித்தது என அறியப்படமுடியாத தொலை காலமாக (தொல்லை)

2. இருந்து வரும் (இரும்)


3.பிறவிப் பயணத்திலே ஆழ்த்துகின்ற (பிறவி சூழும்)

4.அறியாமையாகிய இடரை (தளை)

5.அகற்றி (நீக்கி),

6.அதன் விளைவால் சுகதுக்கமெனும் துயரங்கள் விலக (அல்லல் அறுத்து),

7.முழுநிறைவாய்த் தன்னுளே இறைவனை உணர்த்துவதே (ஆனந்த மாக்கியதே),

8.பிறந்து இறக்கும் காலவெளிகளில் (எல்லை)

9.பிணைக்காமல் (மருவா)

10.காக்கும் மெய்யறிவினைத் தருகின்ற (நெறியளிக்கும்),

11.என் தலைவனான மாணிக்க வாசகரின் (வாதவூரெங்கோன்)

12.திருவாசகம் எனும் தேன் (திருவா சகமென்னுந் தேன்)

முதல்வரி: பிறவி என்பது முன்வினை விதையால் முளைப்பதோர் பெருமரம். அந்த ‘முன்வினை’ எங்கு ஆரம்பித்தது எனச் சொல்ல இயலாது. ஆனால் ‘அறியாமை’ ஒன்றே ஆசைக்கும்,, அச்சத்துக்கும் காரணம் என்பதால், அவையே வினைகளை விளைவிப்பன என்பதால், தொடர்ந்து வரும் பிறவிகளுக்கு, ‘அறியாமையே’ காரணம்

அறியாமைக்கு ஆரம்பம் கிடையாது. நமக்கு ஒரு பொருளைப் பற்றிய அறிவு எப்போதிருந்து இல்லை? அதைச் சொல்ல முடியாது. அதனாலேதான் முதலடியில், ஆரம்பமில்லாத அஞ்ஞானத்தை பிறவிகளுக்குக் காரணமாகச் சொல்லியது. ஆனால் அறியாமை, அறிவின் எழுச்சியால், அப்போதே முடிந்து விடும்.

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.


This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/


A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/