1/ So, there's a lot to say about this @BenSasse piece, including a contestable and contentious conception of the realm of political life. But ...

2/ I want instead to focus on this passage.
3/ I notice that he never defines this mythical past. It's just "the past." It partakes of Phoebe Buffay's division of the past into the "colonial era" and "yore."
4/ The problem here is that any attempt to specify this "past" more clearly would have to surrender Sasse's claims to universality.
5/ To the extent that "the whole town" turned out and rooted for the same team, Sasse is figuring authentic Americanness as involving small, racially and otherwise homogeneous communities.
6/ Because in heterogeneous communities, we have never all rooted for the same team. That's partly because, in racially heterogeneous communities, schools have always been racially segregated--first de jure, then de facto as a holdover of de jure segregation.
7/ And, of course, even plenty of white Americans didn't turn out (or did so only under pressure) on Friday nights to support the team. Some just don't care for football. Others found the performance and celebration of combative masculinity off-putting.
8/ Of course, in saying this, Sasse and his fans might reply that, there I go, "bringing politics into" what ought to be an "apolitical" realm.
9/ This goes back to my initial point about Sasse's stunted conception of the political. For him, football in small towns with boys on the field, girls as cheerleaders, and "the whole town" in the stands is apolitical.
10/ Noting the way that this constructs and reifies race, gender, sexuality, and a whole host of other social constructs is "politicizing."
11/ Thus, the call to preserve this "apolitical" realm is a call to avoid challenges to the dominant ways of thinking about these things. The way they are is naturalized, and challenges to them are thereby implicitly figured as (improper political) challenges to the natural order
12/ But of course the status quo isn't apolitical. It's both a consequence of and a condition for politics.
13/ Figuring the status quo as natural is simply a political move made for and by people who disproportionately benefit from the status quo (i.e., people with unearned privilege).
14/14 It would be a mistake to take this politically motivated (which is not to say consciously so--there's a lot of room for good-faith motivated reasoning here) naturalization at face value. /Fin/
15/14 Oh, and by the way: all politics is identity politics, but Sasse's stuff is an *especially* transparent example of conservative identity politics.
16/14 If you happen to want to read more of what I have to say about the structuring of the American political order ... https://t.co/V5Kc521q5d

More from All

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"