"The One That Didn't Work Out." Startup founders, you know what I mean: We spend years on a product - starting it from scratch, recruiting friends, getting it off the ground. We think we'll spend years on this. This is the one. We tell that to ourselves, investors, and friends
10 years ago today, I had the idea for an app I thought was interesting. I called it Bump, and sent this email to Andy Huibers.
— David Lieb (@dflieb) October 13, 2018
Here\u2019s a thread with some memories and lessons learned in the last 10 years. pic.twitter.com/jjfOrOlOVj
Btw, Groupon is a public co worth ~$2B. Obv it's not Google but @andrewmason still made it a huge success. This interview is compelling and honest, though ignore the headline. "The Quick Rise and Even Faster Fall of Groupon, Through the Eyes of Its CEO" https://t.co/7aE945ngLG
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) October 14, 2018
More from All
ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x