"Async" Slack channels are one of our secret weapons at @beondeck

After
using them for ~18 months, I can't imagine Slack without them. Particularly now— operating 100% remote with 62 teammates in 14 timezones.

Here's the "how it works" post I use to open each new 1:1 channel 👇

Welcome to our private "async" channel!! 👋👋

Here's how it works —>
Anytime you need a quick response, e.g. "are you coming to this meeting?", use DM.

A Slack DM is like a tap on the shoulder. It says "I need your attention now, please stop what you are doing." Use these sparingly.
Anytime you're posting something more suited to asynchronous consideration and reply, post it here instead.

Treat your post in the main channel like the subject line of an email, then thread *everything* else, including any links and images. The thread is your "email" body.
Sometimes it helps to add an emoji to the start of the "subject line" post, indicating the nature of the message.

E.g.
❓ = question
💡 = idea
ℹ️ = fyi
🎉 = celebration fyi
Before starting a new thread, do a quick "cmd + F" search to see if we've already discussed the topic.

If so, you can add to the original thread, "repost to channel", quote and/or merge in older threads (a bit like Twitter, I suppose)
Keeping each "subject line" to one sentence helps keep this channel easily scannable, particularly if we're parallel processing lots of topics

You can also try pinning or saving threads, and adding emoji reactions, e.g.

☑️ = completed/closed
👀 = seen
⏳ = waiting on something
I recommend using Slack's “sidebar sections”, so you can keep all your async channels in one place, and collapse them to avoid being tempted by "bolded" channels.

I aim to check async channels once or twice per day (same as my inbox, fwiw)

Own your focus, don't break your flow.
We can also use this space to share “high bandwidth” video or voice updates asynchronously.

Try posting a “subject”, then recording a quick @loom video/audio, or using the https://t.co/r9Mpkby2Y9 “VM bot”.
VM's are best for dense, context-rich updates.

Don't send VM's just because you can’t be bothered typing, that just offloads the work to the recipient to listen.

Used effectively, async video/VM's can save us hours of meetings, and all sorts of other coordination pains.
We're always evolving this model, so let us know if you have any ideas or feedback!

Looking forward to working with you 📈💪💥

More from All

The best morning routine?

Starts the night before.

9 evening habits that make all the difference:

1. Write down tomorrow's 3:3:3 plan

• 3 hours on your most important project
• 3 shorter tasks
• 3 maintenance activities

Defining a "productive day" is crucial.

Or else you'll never be at peace (even with excellent output).

Learn more


2. End the workday with a shutdown ritual

Create a short shutdown ritual (hat-tip to Cal Newport). Close your laptop, plug in the charger, spend 2 minutes tidying your desk. Then say, "shutdown."

Separating your life and work is key.

3. Journal 1 beautiful life moment

Delicious tacos, presentation you crushed, a moment of inner peace. Write it down.

Gratitude programs a mindset of abundance.

4. Lay out clothes

Get exercise clothes ready for tomorrow. Upon waking up, jump rope for 2 mins. It will activate your mind + body.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?