Being right versus being effective

I wish more folks would put attention on the latter. I believe it is what effects real change. Perhaps it’s my bias, since I am an educator. Unfortunately I see more of the former than the latter. I think some balance would be helpful. (1/n)

From what I have seen, especially on SM, when folks double down on their “rightness”, it is often compelled by pain, trauma, frustration, ego, etc. It often manifests as “tunnel vision”, which is not always bad, but isn’t the only way to operate. (2/n)
This mode often results in an endless back-and-forth where nobody really changes how they think about things. Maybe some onlookers pick up some information but it’s kind of a throw spaghetti on the wall and see what sticks approach. (3/n)
OTOH, being effective is no less concerned with conveying what a person believes is right, but functions v differently. To be effective, one must read the room, meet people where they are, be skillful, responsive, strategic, empathic, holistic, patient, nimble, nuanced...(4/n)
...listen, respond, move with awareness, consider information they might not have had before, etc. In other words, being effective calls upon our higher qualities, ones that expand us and the space that we hold and occupy. (5/n)
When I say “effective”, I don’t mean “got the other person to shut up” or whatever metric folks use to gauge “winning” the argument. By effective, I mean, successfully teach or convey information or a perspective that the other person/people are now at least considering. (6/n)
It’s also the difference between lecturing and teaching. (And talks versus interactive discussions)

Of course this depends upon the other people being open to listening. In some cases that’s never gonna happen. It’s futile to try to be effective. Or maybe even to engage.
(7/n)
But in other situations, that’s part of the skill. How to convey information that makes people curious and open to hearing something they didn’t know before? How to get people to listen to something that might be unsettling because it disrupts what they thought they knew? (8/n)
I’m not saying I’m an expert in this by any means! Only that it frames my intentions when I communicate. In my experience, it’s a lot easier to slip into being right and a lot more difficult to take stock of what’s happening and be effective. (9/n)
It also very much has to do with my inner state. When I do my sadhana, when I have high prana and am grounded and centered, I am much better at being present and being effective. (10/n)
I think of prana like turgor pressure; it’s the water running thru the stem that makes a flower stand tall and be noticed🌷.

Else it droops and wilts; still a flower but not as inspiring 🥀. Maybe it’s a time for the flower to rest.

Just an offering for reflection. 🙏🏽
(11/11)

More from All

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.