संस्कृतम् - Dead or Alive?

Came across a discussion on BVP that linked to a few leading western Indologists opining on the Sanskrit Revival movement & the spoken Sanskrit movement

https://t.co/KXFQU9exUx

Quite instructive!

The starting point - the famous chai video of Pollock (Padma Shri 2010)

Efforts to revive or ‘speak’ संस्कृतम् as exemplified by unwashed Hindoos trying to order चायपानीयम् in Sanscreet memorably filled Prof. Pollock with ‘nwosayae’ 😀 https://t.co/HMEfonAsnw
The evocatively titled Death of Sanskrit by Sheldon Pollock had crystallized the Indological view that Sanskrit is dead & its best left dead!

He also shared a horror of Hindoos, ‘Inheritors of a past that they did not create themselves’ actually daring to bring it back to life https://t.co/lnunp8639E
Now most संस्कृतम् learners will find it most perplexing !

Why should an Indologist, a lifelong Sanskritist have such a horror of संस्कृतम् springing back to life?

किमर्थं भोः?

To help संस्कृतानुरागिनः understand their PoV, an instructive thread is attached
Prof. Stella Sandahl, an Emeritus Professor at Dept. of East Asian Studies has this opening remark

‘How can we rescue Sanskrit from these vandals’?

She claims that speaking Sanskrit is correlated with demolishing temples & violating nuns!

This is a Professor & a Sanskritist!
A raft of Indian compradors & native informants support this view

For e.g an Indian ‘Professor of Sanskrit’ is echoing the pernicious nature of spoken संस्कृतम्

So, भवान् संस्कृतं जानाति किम्? may be the Hindoo revivalist equivalent of the infamous East Pakistani lungi test🤯
HH Hock, a leading Indologist, takes a more nuanced , but still negative view

Spoken सरलसंस्कृतम् is a pidgin & creates a false, manufactured sense of Identity!
George Hart, a Sanskritist & Tamizh Indologist & a Padma Shri (2015) has this to say

The trouble with spoken Sanskrit is that its dumbed down! It creates a sense of arrogance & ‘superiority’! Doesn’t make you rap like Kalidasa!
There are of course, sane views also

Heres one
Probably panicking at the thought of having stepped on a land-mine, Professor Sandahl asks plaintively

‘Why can’t we let it be, a beautiful dead language’?🤡

Apparently Panini assassinated Sanscreet!🤯
This topic is relevant given a recent tweet on ‘scholars’ & twitter folks who rubbish them

These above screenshots shows the nature of politics/views connected with Indology scholarship

Staggering hypocrisy!

No wonder hotheads on either side quickly escalate to गाल्यः।😂
And to conclude by following the sane advice ‘do they even read a line’ of what they discussed, here is what Sarala Samskritam sets out to do! https://t.co/ucYH5y5BuY
A few screenshots of the stated purpose & design of the सरलसम्स्कृतम् movement

Quite clear that it’s designed as a ‘gateway program’ & tries to be fully compliant with the Paninian framework
Coda

A whole bunch of privileged Indologists are fearful of unwashed masses learning संस्कृतम्, becoming aware & ‘horror of horrors’, ‘debating’ with them!

They fear संस्कृतम् will engender civilizational confidence

They fear a living संस्कृतम्।

पठतु संस्कृतम्। जयतु भारतम्।

More from All

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
A THREAD ON @SarangSood

Decoded his way of analysis/logics for everyone to easily understand.

Have covered:
1. Analysis of volatility, how to foresee/signs.
2. Workbook
3. When to sell options
4. Diff category of days
5. How movement of option prices tell us what will happen

1. Keeps following volatility super closely.

Makes 7-8 different strategies to give him a sense of what's going on.

Whichever gives highest profit he trades in.


2. Theta falls when market moves.
Falls where market is headed towards not on our original position.


3. If you're an options seller then sell only when volatility is dropping, there is a high probability of you making the right trade and getting profit as a result

He believes in a market operator, if market mover sells volatility Sarang Sir joins him.


4. Theta decay vs Fall in vega

Sell when Vega is falling rather than for theta decay. You won't be trapped and higher probability of making profit.