What do Charles Dow and Jesse Livermore have in common? They used price and volume to anticipate where the market was heading next,
-Anna Coulling.
Note: Only go ahead if you are passionate about learning price and volume.
The Year 2021 Gone By, What a Journey It was for me ,So Much Learning,
I am posting this to express my Gratitude towards Hitesh Bhai @hjyadav and Mitesh Bhai.
This Is What I Tried To Learn From Your Workshop and Still Learning From Both of You,
A Thread on "The Power Of 3"🧵🧵
What do Charles Dow and Jesse Livermore have in common? They used price and volume to anticipate where the market was heading next,
-Anna Coulling.
Note: Only go ahead if you are passionate about learning price and volume.
"The Power Of 3"
“3 Rising Candles With 3 Rising Volume Bar At Break Out Level.”
It was an eye opener event for me, Mitesh bhai's workshop in Aug 2019, Specially for someone like me who was always fascinated by all sorts of Indicators.
Finding a Trade is just 10% work,rest 90% is courage to execute your trading plans,discipline to follow money management,as a trader one needs this skills too.
I have found my edge in finding breakouts in mid cap stocks,any one can have their own.
"The Power Of "3"
1. Stock should be closing with higher highs for 3 consecutive days.
2. Along with the price, the volume must be rising.
3. Watch out for those rejection candles.
4. Entry can be made during closing hours or next day.
6. SL- Will be the low of first candle,that's the risk should be keep in mind.
7.Risk should be 1% of your capital in one trade so Money Management skills must.
As Hitesh bhai said in his spaces,
"Upar sirf hawa hein jane ko kahin bhi ja sakta hein"
Bottom line is do not set target or else exit will be too soon.
I may have bought,exited too early,stopped out,still holding or buy again based on this patterns,
All Learning's,Do read my writings on chart specially for the Tata's.
Hitesh bhai saw it early as he can but I had waited for pattern to confirm.
I found two more Identical"Balarmpur and TechM" though I have not posted charts for his two earlier.
Dr. Lal path one of my special one of 2021 , classic one swing trade though I missed major move but lucky to be part final move to 3500.
Jyoti Res- this one had classic flat pattern and break out.
Guj Alkali- See those volume bars do we need any other validation, massive one isn't it? again saying loud n clear do not miss 3*3 pattern.
Thank You,
Here's the scanner, "Nothing More Nothing Less"
https://t.co/siKvflQvvF
Thanks For Reading.
More from All
You May Also Like
Took me 5 years to get the best Chartink scanners for Stock Market, but you’ll get it in 5 mminutes here ⏰
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.