On April 9, 51-Infantry-Brigade of the Pakistan Army, crossed the international border into the ‘Rann of Kutch’ and captured Sardar Post near Kanjarkot. On April 24, Pakistan attacked again with tanks and artillery and captured four more posts.
THREAD!
Complete deatails on 1965 war from rann of kutch to battle of dograi
On April 9, 51-Infantry-Brigade of the Pakistan Army, crossed the international border into the ‘Rann of Kutch’ and captured Sardar Post near Kanjarkot. On April 24, Pakistan attacked again with tanks and artillery and captured four more posts.
Although Indian force in that region, was not prepared to drive out the Pakistani forces at that moment.
India responded to Pakistani aggression in rann of kutch by conducting operation ablaze. This Operation included the measures taken by the Indian Army along the western border in May-Jun 1965, following Pakistani attack in the Rann of Kutch
Pakistan, in a grand scheme, decided to send over, somewhere between 10,000 to 30,000 soldiers of Pakistan army, into Kashmir valley.
& Finally on 28 august 1965 indian army captured haji pir pass under pok which was termed as the most bravest act after ww2
Image showing indian army waving tricolor at haji pir pass
After failure in operation Gibraltar, the shameless Pakistani army initiated their plan B and launched Operation Grand Slam in the Chamb sector of Akhnoor, with the objective to capture this vital town.
Here are some interviews of Pakistani army personnel's who are accepting the truth that it was "pakistan who started the 1965 war"
Air marshal asghar khan
https://t.co/uAVzLbaNxX
— Harshit Mittal 3.0 (@play_boyz71) August 27, 2021
In order to ease the pressure over Akhnoor, the Indian leadership made the bold move of invading Lahore.
The Battle of Burki was a battle fought by Indian infantry and Pakistani armour in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Barki is a village that lies south-east of Lahore near the border with Punjab, India and is connected with Lahore by the Bridge of Ichogil canal.
Next day, Pakistan's 1st Armoured Division, pushed an offensive, with the intent to capture Amritsar and the bridge on river Beas to Jalandhar.
Pakistan attacked with about 176 Patton tanks and 44 M24 Chaffe tanks.
Some images of captured/destroyed Pakistani tanks
To gain elsewhere, once advance to Lahore was blocked, India's ‘1st Armoured Division’, launched an offensive towards Sialkot. The Division was forced back by the Pakistani ‘6th Armoured Divison’ at Chawinda.
The Battle of Dograi, one of the bloodiest battles in Indian military history, was fought at the town of Dograi near Lahore - first with guns and grenades, then with bayonets, and finally with bare hands on the dark night of September 21/22, 1965.
The jat regiment of indian army nailed Pakistani punjabji army completely
1. India won 1,920 sqkm of territory; Pakistan won 540 sqkm
2. 2,862 Indian soldiers were killed; Pakistan lost 5,800 soldiers
3. India lost 97 tanks; 450 Pakistani tanks were destroyed or captured
Title of book clearly expose pakistani propaganda on 1965 war
More from All
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
