Hackathon is an event in which student developers or working professionals or anyone technical/non-technical people come together and form a team and work on an issue/topic of that hackathon collaboratively in bounded time.
Benefits of Hackathon
Thread 🧵
Hackathon is an event in which student developers or working professionals or anyone technical/non-technical people come together and form a team and work on an issue/topic of that hackathon collaboratively in bounded time.
In a hackathon many innovations take place, hackathon gives you a playground to play with technology with your team, imagine without a hackathon you can build a project or something but it would not be diversified
In hackathons, you can network a lot, you can increase your friend circle, you meet new people, In hackathons, there is a coffee break with your team so you can network there, and there is also a meet for the different teams so they come and network.
In hackathons, Everyone is in the mood of learning and teaching, eg. in your team 1 guy knows the frontend 1 knows the backend and you know the cloud so you all can teach and learn from each other. and you can learn from anyone, no barrier at all.
More from All
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
