Tons of respect to you @BDHerzinger, love your work, but your arguments in @LowyInstitute's Interpreter on why US needs to support transfer of sovereignty of #DiegoGarcia are both misguided & dangerous. Here's why:

1. Sovereignty: It's not our place to say it. US policy is NOT to take positions on sovereignty and for good reason. A great many allies have competing and counter-competing sovereignty claims. Extremely dangerous to take sides vis a vis our allies over sovereignty issues.
Doing so would cause a political crisis w a FVEY and @NATO ally. Our forces there do not alter this. We cannot make judgements on sovereignty based on the presence of US forces. Doing so would undermine our reliability with a great many relationships where US forces are present.
If the UK were itself to lead on this, then the US could certainly make its views known or take a position, but that is not the current UK position, so we must not / cannot do anything that could be construed as undermining an ally's sovereignty.
2. Legality The UK has stated - and with good reason - that an Advisory Opinion is advice provided to the UN General Assembly at its request; it is not a legally binding judgment. And there are many issues with Mauritius' own claims:
Mauritius has never held sovereignty for the islands so gifting them the islands would be the same as accepting Argentina's colonial-era claims over the Falklands. The "original inhabitants" were imported labor, the islands were uninhabited before France and UK administration.
3. Unintended Consequences: UK - a state we're pushing to join us in Indo-Pacific - loses regional capacity bc of the loss of DG. A US-UK crisis ensues, weakening our closest ally at the worst possible moment vis a vis the strategic environment.
Emboldened by their success, whichever large state -we can guess who- that organized & funded the UN shenanigans pour resources into other movements to reduce the strategic array of Western overseas territories; Gibraltar, Guantanamo Bay, New Caledonia, etc. Why wouldn't it?
Mauritius promises 99-year lease but could be pressured to change its mind (by PRC which owns 52% of its debt). If UK and US were told to withdraw all forces, fairly sure, Beijing would offer diplomatic support in UN and promise to defend M sovereignty by force, if necessary.
Such scenario would compel US / UK to either withdraw or use force. Either way, a terrible outcome. The use of DG by PLAN and PLAAF gives the PRC strategic reach in the Indian Ocean Region, putting immense pressure on India and its navy. Secures PRC control over regional SLOCS.
In summary:
-We don't have sovereignty. Isn't a US decision.
-Changing US policy on sovereignty claims others a bad idea.
-Non-binding advisory opinion against our own ally & our common strategic interests (in widest Atlantic/alliance sense).
-Glass houses

More from All

Master Thread of all my threads!

Hello!! 👋

• I have curated some of the best tweets from the best traders we know of.

• Making one master thread and will keep posting all my threads under this.

• Go through this for super learning/value totally free of cost! 😃

1. 7 FREE OPTION TRADING COURSES FOR


2. THE ABSOLUTE BEST 15 SCANNERS EXPERTS ARE USING

Got these scanners from the following accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sanjufunda
3. @sanstocktrader
4. @SouravSenguptaI
5. @Rishikesh_ADX


3. 12 TRADING SETUPS which experts are using.

These setups I found from the following 4 accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sourabhsiso19
3. @ITRADE191
4.


4. Curated tweets on HOW TO SELL STRADDLES.

Everything covered in this thread.
1. Management
2. How to initiate
3. When to exit straddles
4. Examples
5. Videos on

You May Also Like

Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
One of the most successful stock trader with special focus on cash stocks and who has a very creative mind to look out for opportunities in dark times

Covering one of the most unique set ups: Extended moves & Reversal plays

Time for a 🧵 to learn the above from @iManasArora

What qualifies for an extended move?

30-40% move in just 5-6 days is one example of extended move

How Manas used this info to book


Post that the plight of the


Example 2: Booking profits when the stock is extended from 10WMA

10WMA =


Another hack to identify extended move in a stock:

Too many green days!

Read