The target of Adani Ports for 1010 is still intact https://t.co/bbyfmE3aK2
Adani Ports - the 42 weeks of price consolidation in a symmetrical triangle has decisively broken out for the open target of 1010 https://t.co/vGyAGlwKCw pic.twitter.com/2tVmwddeOX
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) April 5, 2022
More from The_Chartist 📈
I believe 5-10 stocks are enough for a retail investor to achieve super performance. And with small capital, there is no point in buying 20/30 names which doesn't even get appropriate initial capital.
Stock: CDSL
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) December 16, 2020
CMP - 516.95. Low risk setup. Weak below 500. Target open. Stock retesting the ascending triangle BO line. Kindly check please. @nishkumar1977 @Rishikesh_ADX @VijayThk @kuttrapali @Thekalal @PAVLeader pic.twitter.com/PlcpOMsdnz
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
How to record a trading journal (TJ) & what to analyze?
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) December 14, 2021
What is in a TJ?
Buy Date
Stock Name
The time frame you analyzed (D/W/M)
Long/Short?
Buy Price
SL
Sell Price
Risk took (% of capital)
Sell date
No. of days held
P/L
P/L as % of capital
Buy Reason?
Invested capital/trade pic.twitter.com/WnrvmYuOV0
Nifty Private Bank https://t.co/BwG1DKhhLc
I am watching a big bearish H&S top building up in Nifty Private Bank Index. Any breakdown will result in increased volatility in respective charts. For traders - definitely not a spot to be in. The index has to move beyond 19900 to negate the pattern. pic.twitter.com/IGFeyNrtQV
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) June 19, 2022
More from Adaniports
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?