@Ayjchan @MoNscience @nicholsonbaker8 Is this not "willfully bioengineering"?
No one's implying "for nefarious purpose"

Maybe I made it up myself or copied it from an scam site?

Check out the authors:
https://t.co/Llb6NKUEPc

@MoNscience @nicholsonbaker8

@MoNscience @nicholsonbaker8 That *these* "researchers were willfully involved with bioengineering SARS-CoV-2" is published demonstrated fact.

@BillyBostickson @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul Excellently written article
Nicholson Baker
https://t.co/IZWOjdYeGL
https://t.co/0jeie0jIHO

Worth its long length, although the conclusion is muted, for acceptability I imagine.

@Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul Original x Rewritten

@Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul @nicholsonbaker8

Some takes out of this master piece. Head been spinning for some time.

Implications!

@Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul @nicholsonbaker8 1- It was Fauxi & his moneytrail from the beginning:

@Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul @nicholsonbaker8 The Wuhan Lab&Leak "coincidence" argument leads to the other Lab&Leak "coincidence" argument: